Supreme Court of the United States
State Oil Co. v. Khan
November 4, 1997522 U.S. 3
Summary
Justice O’Connor, writing for a unanimous Court, held that vertical maximum price fixing must be evaluated under the Sherman Act’s rule of reason rather than condemned as unlawful per se, overruling Albrecht v. Herald Co. The Court explained that maximum resale prices can promote competition and protect consumers against dealer monopoly power, while the rule of reason can identify anticompetitive applications. Stare decisis did not require retaining a rule whose economic and doctrinal foundations had eroded. The Court vacated the Seventh Circuit’s judgment and remanded for that court to consider respondents’ entitlement to damages under the proper standard. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- The standard governing vertical maximum price fixing under § 1 of the Sherman Act.. Vertical maximum price fixing is subject to the rule of reason, not a per se prohibition; it is not categorically lawful either.
- Whether stare decisis bars overruling Albrecht v. Herald Co.. Stare decisis does not require retaining Albrecht, which is overruled.
Docket 96-871
Cited authorities
- 26 Stat. 209
- 15 U.S.C. § 1
- 75 Colum. L. Rev. 282
- 42 Vand. L. Rev. 1539
- 48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 886
- 44 Vand. L. Rev. 1007
- 71 Geo. L.J. 1487
- 92 Stat. 322
Cited by
- Rob Brantley, Darryn Cooke, William and Beverley Costley, Peter G. Harris, Christiana Hills, Michael B. Kovac…
- (PS) Howard v. City of Sacramento
- Clear Connection Corporation, a California Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, a Delaware…
- Commonwealth v. Jason Loadholt
- Brian W. Coughlin
- United States v. Donald Fell
- The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee v. Anthony Mitchell, Appellant
- Moates v. Facebook Inc.