Supreme Court of the United States
Heintz v. Jenkins
April 18, 1995514 U.S. 291
Summary
Justice Breyer delivered the unanimous opinion holding that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to attorneys who regularly collect consumer debts through litigation. The statutory definition encompasses those activities, and Congress repealed the express attorney exemption without replacing it with a litigation exemption. Potential difficulties in applying particular conduct restrictions, a sponsor’s post-enactment statement, and nonbinding FTC staff commentary did not justify creating an implied exemption. The Court affirmed the Seventh Circuit’s judgment rejecting dismissal on the ground that litigating attorneys fall outside the Act. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Whether attorneys who regularly collect consumer debts through litigation are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.. The Act applies to attorneys who regularly engage in consumer-debt-collection activity, even when that activity consists of litigation.
Docket 94-367
Cited authorities
- Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- 91 Stat. 874
- 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692
- Pub. L. 95-109, § 803
- 91 Stat. 874
- Pub. L. 99-361, 100
- 53 FR 50097
Cited by
- Carol Lannan and Ann Winn v. Levy & White and Robert R…
- William M. McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.c.
- Glenn Eilert v. Charles I. Turner
- In Re: Jose Sr. Trevino, Teresa Trevino, Debtor(s) Teresa Trevino, Plaintifffs) v. Hsbc Mortgage Services, Inc…
- In Re: Jose Sr. Trevino, Teresa Trevino, Debtor(s) Teresa Trevino, Plaintiff(s) v. Hsbc Mortgage Services, Inc…
- Thompson v. Fay Servicing LLC
- Brunson v. Williams
- Taggatz v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.