Supreme Court of the United States
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schleier
June 14, 1995515 U.S. 323
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Stevens joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer, held that neither the backpay nor the liquidated-damages portion of Schleier’s ADEA settlement was excludable from gross income under § 104(a)(2). Exclusion requires both an action based on tort or tort-type rights and damages received on account of personal injuries or sickness; the settlement satisfied neither requirement. Justice Scalia concurred in the judgment without a separate writing. Justice O’Connor dissented, joined by Justice Thomas throughout and Justice Souter in Part II. She argued that age discrimination causes personal injury, that the ADEA’s remedies distinguish it from the statute considered in Burke, and that the Court departed from longstanding administrative interpretations of the exclusion.
Holding
- Requirements for excluding damages under § 104(a)(2).. A taxpayer must establish both that the underlying cause of action is based on tort or tort-type rights and that the damages were received on account of personal injuries or sickness.
- Whether ADEA backpay and liquidated damages are received on account of personal injuries or sickness.. Neither component of Schleier’s ADEA settlement was received on account of personal injuries or sickness and neither was excludable.
- Whether an ADEA recovery is based on tort or tort-type rights.. An ADEA recovery does not satisfy the regulation’s tort or tort-type rights requirement.
Docket 94-500
Cited authorities
- 29 U.S.C. §§ 623
- Rev. Rul. 85-98
- Rev. Rul. 93-88
- Rev. Rul. 93-88
- 29 U.S.C. § 631(a)
- 26 C.F.R. § 1.104-1
- 26 U.S.C. § 104
- 26 U.S.C. § 61
Cited by
- Dr. Marjorie McMillan v. Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Dr. Gus Thornton and Dr…
- Sharon Barnes and Duncan Barnes v. United States
- Philip A. Driscoll and Lynne B. Driscoll, A.K.A. Donna L. Driscoll, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…
- Jonathan E. Stromme and Marylou Stromme, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
- David A. Gates and Christine A. Gates, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
- Harbor Bancorp & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent Edward J. Keith and Elena Keith V…
- Philip A. Driscoll and Lynne B. Driscoll, A.k.a. Donna L. Driscoll v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Jonathan E. Stromme and Marylou Stromme v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue