Supreme Court of the United States
American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens
January 18, 1995513 U.S. 219
Summary
Justice Ginsburg's majority opinion held that the Airline Deregulation Act preempts the frequent flyer participants' Illinois Consumer Fraud Act claims but permits their breach-of-contract claims to proceed insofar as they seek enforcement of the airline's own undertakings without enlargement through external state policies. The Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded, leaving the underlying contract interpretation unresolved. Justice Stevens, concurring in part and dissenting in part without any joiners, agreed that the contract claims could proceed but would also permit the consumer-fraud claims and affirm the entire judgment. Justice O'Connor, joined by Justice Thomas except as to Part I–B, concurred in the judgment in part and dissented in part, reasoning that both sets of claims were preempted and that judicial enforcement of contracts necessarily invokes state law and policy. Justice Scalia did not participate.
Holding
- Whether the frequent flyer claims relate to airline rates or services.. The claims relate to airline rates and services; the preemption inquiry does not turn on whether frequent flyer programs are essential or merely peripheral to airline operations.
- Whether the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act claims are preempted.. The Act preempts the participants' Consumer Fraud Act claims.
- Whether the breach-of-contract claims are preempted.. The Act permits judicial enforcement of the airline's self-imposed contractual undertakings, confined to the parties' bargain without enlargement or enhancement based on external state laws or policies.
Docket 93-1286
Cited authorities
- 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132
- CA11
- CA10
- 108 Stat. 745
- 72 Stat. 731
- 92 Stat. 1705
- 29 U.S.C. § 1144
- 78 Nw. U. L. Rev. 303
Cited by
- Gerald MacIntosh v. Interface Group Massachusetts-Comm, Inc.
- Peter Fenn v. Trans National Travel, Inc.
- Colin Bower, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of His Minor Children, N and R v. Mirvat El-Nady, and Egyptair Airlines
- Timothy P. Chambers Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. RDI Logistics, Inc.
- DaSilva v. Border Transfer of MA, Inc.
- Montoya v. Crst Expedited, Inc.
- Irabor v. Lufthansa Airlines
- Cintron v. JetBlue Airways Corporation