Supreme Court of the United States
United States National Bank of Oregon v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.
June 7, 1993508 U.S. 439
Summary
The Court unanimously held that section 92, authorizing certain national banks to act as insurance agents, was not repealed in 1918. Justice Souter explained that the 1916 statute's structure, language, and subject matter established that Congress placed the provision in the Federal Reserve Act, notwithstanding misplaced quotation marks suggesting otherwise. The Court also held that the Court of Appeals had authority to consider section 92's continued existence despite the parties' failure initially to contest it, and did not abuse its discretion by doing so. The Court reversed and remanded without deciding whether the Comptroller correctly interpreted the provision to permit nationwide insurance sales. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Authority to address an unasserted question concerning the existence of governing law.. The Court of Appeals had constitutional authority and discretion to consider whether section 92 remained in force, and did not abuse that discretion after giving the parties ample opportunity to address the question.
- Whether the 1918 legislation repealed section 92.. Section 92 remains in force because the 1916 legislation placed it in section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act, which the 1918 legislation did not amend.
Docket 92-484
Cited authorities
- the Code section 92
- 39 Stat. 753
- 12 U.S.C. § 92
- 12 U.S.C. § 92
- 96 Stat. 1511
- 101 Stat. 583
- 5 U.S.C. § 706
- 1 U.S.C. § 204
Cited by
- Don DiFIORE, Leon Bailey, James E. Brooks, Ritson Desrosiers, Marcelino Coleta, Tony Pasuy, Laurence Allsop…
- S.S. v. City of Springfield
- St. John Missionary Baptist Church, Symphuel Anderson, Beverly Davis and Patricia Mays v. Merle F — Schenck, J…
- In the Matter Of: Olympic Natural Gas Co., Debtor. Randy W. Williams v. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
- Maxine Adams v. U.S. Department of Justice
- United States v. Vascular Solutions, Inc., (1) And, Howard Root, (2)
- His Company, Inc. v. Robert Scott Stover
- In Re: Samuel Evans Wyly, Debtors