Supreme Court of the United States
Dewsnup v. Timm
January 15, 1992502 U.S. 410
Summary
The Court held that § 506(d) does not permit a Chapter 7 debtor to strip down a real-property lien to the judicially determined value of the collateral when the creditor's claim is secured by a lien and fully allowed under § 502. Finding statutory ambiguity, the Court relied on the pre-Code rule that liens survive bankruptcy and concluded that subsequent appreciation should benefit the lienholder. Justice Blackmun wrote for Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices White, Stevens, O'Connor, and Kennedy. Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Souter, dissented, arguing that the statutory text unambiguously incorporates § 506(a)'s valuation-based definition of a secured claim and therefore voids the lien's unsecured portion. Justice Thomas did not participate.
Holding
- Availability of lien stripping under § 506(d) for an allowed, undersecured real-property claim in Chapter 7.. Section 506(d) does not permit the debtor to strip down the creditor's lien because the claim is secured by a lien and has been fully allowed under § 502.
Docket 90-741
Cited authorities
- 11 U.S.C. §§ 616
- 11 U.S.C. §§ 506
- 11 U.S.C. §§ 1129
- CA10
- CA10
- 11 U.S.C. § 506
- Utah Code Ann. §§ 57-1
- 11 U.S.C. § 1101
Cited by
- Timothy P. Perkins v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Defendant/appellant Brian S. Fahey v. Massachusetts…
- In Re Bruce F. Fortin, Rebecca A. Fortin, Debtors
- In Re Neil Rossman, Debtor. Neil Rossman v. United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue…
- In Re John T. Brown, Debtor. John T. Brown v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Defendant in Re Anthony M…
- In Re Timothy P. Pendergast, Debtor. Timothy P. Pendergast v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue
- Joseph R. Mullins
- Alan Elias
- In the Matter Of: Ronald Bartee, Debtor. Ronald Bartee v. Tara Colony Homeowners Association and Daniel E. O'Connell