Supreme Court of the United States
Perpich v. Department of Defense
June 11, 1990496 U.S. 334
Summary
Justice Stevens delivered the unanimous opinion upholding the Montgomery Amendment. Congress may authorize members of the National Guard to undertake federal active-duty training abroad during peacetime without gubernatorial consent or a declaration of national emergency. Under the unchallenged dual-enlistment system, Guard members ordered into federal service temporarily lose their state-militia status, and the Militia Clauses do not restrict Congress’s independent authority to raise and support armies. The States’ reserved training authority therefore does not establish a constitutional veto over such federal training. The Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ judgment. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Whether the Militia Clauses require gubernatorial consent or a declared national emergency before National Guard members may be ordered to federal active-duty training abroad.. The Montgomery Amendment is constitutional: Congress may authorize such training without gubernatorial consent or a declaration of national emergency.
Docket 89-542
Cited authorities
- 10 U.S.C. §§ 672
- 10 U.S.C. §§ 101
- 32 U.S.C. §§ 101
- 10 U.S.C. § 8500
- 10 U.S.C. §§ 672-675
- 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-333
- 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-333
- 39 Stat. 211
Cited by
- Abbott v. Biden
- Lieutenant Colonel Jane Able, Petty Officer Robert Heigle, First Lieutenant Kenneth Osborn, Sergeant Steven Spencer…
- Richard L. Wright v. Department of Defense and Veterans Services
- Charles v. Rice
- Skaggs v. Howell
- Clark v. City of Montgomery(CONSENT)
- Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety
- Matthew Stanford, and Kentucky Association of Counties Workers' Compensation Fund, Intervenor v. United States Of…