Supreme Court of the United States

Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission of Webster County, West Virginia

January 18, 1989488 U.S. 336

Summary

Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for a unanimous Court, held that Webster County violated equal protection by assessing petitioners’ recently purchased property at values roughly 8 to 35 times those assigned to comparable neighboring property, with disparities persisting for more than a decade. Although purchase-price assessments and transitional adjustments are not inherently unconstitutional, the county’s adjustments failed to achieve rough equality within a reasonable time. The State could not restrict petitioners to seeking increases in other taxpayers’ assessments. The Court reversed and remanded, expressly leaving unresolved whether a similar acquisition-value system adopted and generally applied statewide would be constitutional. There were no separate opinions.

Holding

  • Whether the county’s assessment practices denied petitioners equal protection.. The county’s intentional and systematic undervaluation of comparable neighboring property, producing disparities of roughly 8 to 35 times for more than a decade, violated the Equal Protection Clause.
  • Whether petitioners could be limited to seeking upward revisions of other taxpayers’ assessments.. The State could not remit petitioners exclusively to the remedy of seeking increased assessments on undervalued neighboring property.

Docket 87-1303

Cited by