Supreme Court of the United States

Marino v. Ortiz

January 13, 1988484 U.S. 301

Summary

The Court, per curiam, affirmed both Court of Appeals judgments. An equally divided Court affirmed the dismissal of the officers’ separate lawsuit as an impermissible collateral attack on the consent decree, without establishing a binding resolution of that issue. The Court separately held that the officers could not appeal the consent decree because they were not parties to the underlying litigation and had not intervened for purposes of appeal. A nonparty whose interests are affected should seek intervention, and a denial of intervention is appealable. No separate opinions were provided.

Holding

  • Whether nonparties may bring a separate lawsuit challenging a consent decree without having intervened in the underlying litigation.. The Court affirmed the dismissal by an equally divided vote and therefore established no binding resolution of the question.
  • Whether nonparties who did not intervene may appeal a consent decree.. The officers could not appeal the consent decree because they were not parties to the underlying lawsuit and had not intervened for purposes of appeal.

Docket 86-1415

Cited authorities

  • 78 Stat. 253
  • Fed. R. Civ. P. 24

Cited by