Supreme Court of the United States
Houston v. Lack
June 24, 1988487 U.S. 266
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Brennan, held that a pro se prisoner's notice of appeal is filed when delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the district court clerk. Houston's delivery within the 30-day appeal period therefore gave the Court of Appeals jurisdiction, and its dismissal was reversed. Justice Scalia dissented, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Kennedy. He argued that the filing rules required receipt by the clerk, that a prisoner-specific exception should be adopted through formal rule amendment rather than judicial interpretation, and that Houston's alternative arguments did not justify relief.
Holding
- When a pro se prisoner's notice of appeal is filed for purposes of the civil appeal deadline.. A pro se prisoner's notice of appeal is filed when delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the district court clerk; Houston's notice was therefore timely and the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction.
Docket 87-5428
Cited authorities
- Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Rule 37(a)
- Rule 37(a)(2)
- Rule 3(a)
- Rule 4(a)(1)
- Rule 37(a)
- Rule 28.2
- Rule 4(a)
Cited by
- Sirhan B. Sirhan v. George Galaza
- Lance E. Persson v. Department of Human Services
- Miguel A. Paredes v. Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles
- Derik Colin Oliver v. the People
- Jason A. Green v. Felicia Ponce
- Curtis Hernandez v. N. McDowell
- Rajohn Charles Douglas v. Raymond Madden
- Robert S Woods v. Warden