Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Johnson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Johnson
May 18, 1987481 U.S. 681
Summary
The Court held that the Federal Tort Claims Act does not permit a suit on behalf of a service member for injuries or death arising out of activity incident to service, even when the alleged negligence was committed by civilian federal employees. Because Lieutenant Commander Johnson died while performing a Coast Guard rescue mission and his family received statutory veterans' benefits, the Feres bar applied and the Court declined to create an exception based on the tortfeasor's civilian status. Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens, dissented, arguing that the FTCA's text contains no general servicemember exception and that the Court should not extend the doctrine.
Holding
- Whether the Feres doctrine applies when the alleged tortfeasor is a civilian federal employee.. The Feres doctrine bars all FTCA suits on behalf of service members based on injuries or death arising out of or occurring in the course of activity incident to service, regardless of whether the alleged tortfeasor is a member of the military or a civilian federal employee.
Docket 85-2039
Cited authorities
- 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680
- 14 U.S.C. § 88(a)(1)
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2680
- 28 U.S.C. § 2676
- 28 U.S.C. § 2679
- 38 U.S.C. § 411
- 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680
Cited by
- Denise Woolf, Darren Woolf, and Darren M. Woolf v. United States
- City of San Antonio v. Roxana Tenorio
- Andrew Day, Plaintiff, Appellant v. Massachusetts Air National Guard, United States Department of the Air Force…
- Wilfredo Diaz-Romero, M.d.; Luz Ariana Ortiz-Colon; Conjugal Partnership Diaz-Ortiz, Plaintiffs, Appellants, V…
- Barbara I. Morey v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellee
- Borden v. VA
- Foster v. Department of the Navy
- Claire Colon v. United States of America