Supreme Court of the United States
Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. Lydon
April 18, 1984466 U.S. 294
Summary
The Court reversed the judgment granting habeas relief to Lydon, holding that he was in custody and had exhausted his state remedies, but that the Double Jeopardy Clause did not require a judicial determination of evidentiary sufficiency before he proceeded to a voluntarily requested second-tier trial. The Massachusetts two-tier system treats the de novo proceeding as permissible because the first-tier conviction had not been overturned for insufficiency and the defendant had an absolute choice to obtain a new trial. The Court therefore reaffirmed the validity of the system and rejected application of the rule barring retrial after a reviewing court finds insufficient evidence.
Holding
- Federal habeas custody. Lydon was in custody within the meaning of the federal habeas statutes because his release on personal recognizance imposed substantial legal restraints not shared by the public generally, including mandatory appearances, the possibility of serving the original sentence upon failure to appear, and requirements to remain within the law and maintain good behavior.
- Exhaustion of state remedies. Lydon exhausted his state remedies as to his double-jeopardy claim because the state supreme court definitively rejected the claim and no further state procedure could prevent the allegedly unconstitutional second trial.
- Double jeopardy and the Massachusetts two-tier trial system. The Double Jeopardy Clause did not bar Lydon's second-tier trial merely because he asserted that the first-tier evidence was insufficient. Retrial was permissible because no reviewing court had determined that the evidence was legally insufficient, the first-tier conviction remained unreversed, and Lydon voluntarily chose the de novo procedure.
Docket 82-1479
Cited authorities
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241
- 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)
- 28 U.S.C. § 2254
- 28 U.S.C. § 2241
- 28 U.S.C. § 2254
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241
- 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Cited by
- Joyce Lee Lewis Garrett, Appellant v. the State of Texas, Appellee
- State of Hawai'I, Respondent/plaintiff-Appellee v. Terry J. Davis, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant
- People of Michigan v. Dwayne E Wilson
- Juan Bravo-Fernandez and Hector Martínez-Maldonado v. United States.
- Eric J. Moore, Plaintiff v. United States of America, Defendant
- Darrell Wayland Gilliam, Jr. Pamela Owings James Matthew Swain v. James Lee Foster
- Russell Means, Petitioner-Appellant v. Navajo Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe; Ray Gilmore, Judge Of…
- Karen Ann Parks, Petitioner v. Norman Municipal Hospital, an Own Risk Insurer, and the Workers’ Compensation Court…