Supreme Court of the United States
Steadman v. Securities and Exchange Commission
February 25, 1981450 U.S. 91
Summary
The Court held that the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine violations in disciplinary proceedings under the securities laws using the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard. It concluded that the Administrative Procedure Act, read in light of its text and legislative history, establishes that standard for covered agency adjudications, and that Congress had authority to prescribe it. Justice Powell, joined by Justice Stewart, dissented, arguing that fraud allegations carrying severe sanctions should require clear and convincing evidence.
Holding
- Applicable burden of proof in SEC disciplinary proceedings. When Congress has not prescribed a different standard, the Administrative Procedure Act requires the SEC to establish violations in covered disciplinary adjudications by a preponderance of the evidence, not by clear and convincing evidence.
Docket 79-1266
Cited authorities
Cited by
- David Harrington v. Department of Employment and Training
- Ralph E. Huddleston and Chester E. Bradley, Jr. v. Herman &…
- Herbert R. Gibson, Jr., Gerald P. Gibson, Gibson's Inc., Gibson's Discount Centers, Inc., Ideal Travel Agency, Inc…
- Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee v. First Financial Group of Texas, Defendants-Appellants
- Jerry W. Slusser, First Republic Financial Corporation, and First Republic Trading Corporation, Petitioners, V…
- North Atlantic Securities, LLC v. Office of Securities
- Kippax, D.M.D. v. State of Maine Board of Dental Practice
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Peters