Supreme Court of the United States
Citizens Against Rent Control/coalition for Fair Housing v. City of Berkeley, California
December 14, 1981454 U.S. 290
Summary
The Court held that Berkeley's $250 cap on contributions to committees supporting or opposing ballot measures violates the First Amendment. The cap substantially burdened political association and expression, while the city's asserted interests in preventing corruption, preserving voter confidence, and identifying funding sources were insufficient, particularly because disclosure requirements already revealed contributors. Justice White, dissenting, would have upheld the ordinance as imposing only a minor burden and serving legitimate interests in protecting the referendum process; Justices Blackmun and O'Connor, concurring in the judgment, agreed that the ordinance failed exacting scrutiny but articulated that standard more explicitly.
Holding
- Constitutionality of the contribution limit for ballot-measure committees. A contribution limit that restricts individuals from pooling more than $250 through committees supporting or opposing ballot measures violates the First Amendment because it impermissibly burdens freedom of association and political expression.
Docket 80-737
Cited authorities
- 79 Mich. L. Rev. 1421
- 32 Fed. Comm. L.J. 315
- 48 S. Cal. L. Rev. 922
Cited by
- Bluman v. Federal Election Commission
- Samuel Unger, Petitioners v. the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Respondent…
- Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc.
- Bahia Amawi v. Pflugerville Independent School District
- Beverly C. Daggett, Plaintiffs v. Peter B. Webster, Defendants
- Yes for Life Political Action Committee, Plaintiff v. Peter B. Webster, Defendants
- State of Connecticut v. Anthony Proto State of Connecticut v. Dominick Redente
- Armstrong v. City of Milwaukee