Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Bornstein
January 14, 1976423 U.S. 303
Summary
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case, holding that a subcontractor is liable for three $2,000 forfeitures – one for each separately invoiced shipment that caused false claims – and that double damages must be calculated by doubling the Government's actual loss before any compensatory payments are deducted. Justice Rehnquist, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice White, concurred in part and dissented in part, agreeing with the double‑damages rule but proposing a broader forfeiture test based on proximate cause and foreseeability.
Holding
- Whether the number of statutory forfeitures is measured by the number of causative acts of the subcontractor. United is liable for three forfeitures, one for each separately invoiced shipment that caused Model to submit false claims.
- Whether double damages are to be computed before any deductions. The Government's actual damages are to be doubled before any compensatory payments are subtracted.
Docket 74-712
Cited authorities
- CA10
- 57 Stat. 608
- 12 Stat. 696
- 31 U.S.C. § 231
- 35 Stat. 1153
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 287
- 12 Stat. 698
Cited by
- Ameripride Linen & Apparel Services, Inc. v. Eat Well, Inc., & another
- United States v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
- United States of America, ex Rel., Werner Stebner v. Stewart & Stephenson Services, Inc. McLaughlin Body Co.
- Haight v. Rrsa (commercial) LLC
- United States of America ex rel. John C. Karvelas, Plaintiffs, Appellant v. Melrose-Wakefield Hospital…
- United States of America, Plaintiff, Appellant v. American Heart Research Foundation, Inc., Defendants…
- Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellee v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellant
- United States v. American Heart