Supreme Court of the United States
Kleppe v. New Mexico
June 17, 1976426 U.S. 529
Summary
The Supreme Court held that the Wild Free‑roaming Horses and Burros Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s power under the Property Clause, reversed the district court’s injunction and remanded for further proceedings. The Court reasoned that the Property Clause gives Congress broad authority to make needful regulations respecting public lands, including protection of wildlife, and that the Act does not unlawfully intrude on state sovereignty. The Court declined to decide the extent to which the Act may reach animals that stray onto private land.
Holding
- Whether Congress exceeded its authority under the Property Clause in enacting the Wild Free‑roaming Horses and Burros Act.. The Act is a valid exercise of congressional power under the Property Clause and therefore constitutional.
Docket 74-1488
Cited authorities
- 16 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1340
- 85 Stat. 649
- 16 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1340
- 16 U.S.C. § 1332
- 16 U.S.C. § 1331
- 16 U.S.C. § 1333
- 16 U.S.C. § 1334
- 16 U.S.C. § 1336
Cited by
- Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc., David Brown Vickers, Richard Tallcot, Scott Peterman, Daniel T. Warren, Town Of…
- Upstate Citizens for Equality, Inc., David Brown Vickers, Richard Tallcot, Scott Peterman, Daniel T. Warren, Town Of…
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-405
- United States of America, Appellee v. Douglas Hersom, Defendant, Appellant
- Hunter v. Asrc Federal Data Solutions, LLC
- Norgaard-Larsen v. Phoenix, City of
- Jimenez v. CRC Property Management West Inc.
- Jimenez v. CRC Property Management West Inc.