Supreme Court of the United States
Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio
July 6, 1976428 U.S. 397
Summary
The Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit, holding that a federal district court may not enjoin a sympathy strike that is not over a grievance subject to the contract’s arbitration procedure, even though the strike may violate an express no‑strike clause. The Court relied on the narrow exception articulated in Boys Markets and the Norris‑LaGuardia Act’s anti‑injunction policy. Justice Stevens’ dissent argued the opposite, contending that an injunction should be available when the union breaches its contractual duty not to strike.
Holding
- Whether a federal court may issue an injunction enjoining a sympathy strike that is not over an arbitrable grievance under the collective‑bargaining contract.. A federal court may not enjoin such a sympathy strike because the strike is not over a grievance that the parties are contractually bound to arbitrate; the Norris‑LaGuardia Act’s prohibition on labor‑dispute injunctions therefore applies.
Docket 75-339
Cited authorities
- 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188
- 28 U.S.C. § 1292
- 29 U.S.C. § 173
- 61 Stat. 156
- 29 U.S.C. § 185
- 47 Stat. 70
- 29 U.S.C. § 104
- 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Cited by
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/ibt v. Bnsf Railway, Inc.
- National Association of Government Employees, Inc. v. National Emergency Medical Services Association, Inc., And…
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America-Airline Division and Teamsters…
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America-Airline Di — Goldberg, J…
- City of Cranston v. Rhode Island Laborers’ District Council, Local 1033
- The Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellant v. the Procter & Gamble…
- Salesdrivers, Helpers and Dairy Employees, Local Union No. 683, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Pasha…
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 639 v. Airgas, Inc.