Supreme Court of the United States

Meek v. Pittenger

May 19, 1975421 U.S. 349

Summary

The Court held that Pennsylvania's free textbook loan program for nonpublic-school students did not violate the Establishment Clause because it was part of a general program benefiting all schoolchildren and provided secular books to students. It invalidated the direct loan of instructional materials and equipment to predominantly church-related schools because the aid substantially advanced religion, and invalidated the auxiliary-services program because its administration would require excessive administrative and political entanglement. Justice Brennan, concurring in part and dissenting in part, would also invalidate the textbook program; Justices Rehnquist and Burger, concurring in part and dissenting in part, would uphold the other challenged programs and criticized the Court's entanglement analysis.

Holding

  • Textbook loans to students attending qualifying nonpublic schools. The textbook loan provisions of Act 195 are constitutional because they extend to all schoolchildren the benefits of a general program lending secular textbooks free of charge, with the financial benefit directed to students and parents rather than to the schools.
  • Direct loans of instructional materials and equipment to nonpublic schools. The instructional-material and equipment provisions of Act 195 are unconstitutional because, despite their secular descriptions, they provide substantial direct aid to predominantly church-related schools and therefore have the primary effect of advancing religion.
  • Auxiliary services provided by public personnel on church-related school premises. Act 194 is unconstitutional because ensuring that publicly funded teachers and counselors remain strictly nonideological in church-related schools would require continuing state surveillance and would create both administrative and political entanglement with religion.

Docket 73-1765

Cited authorities