Supreme Court of the United States
Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner
November 3, 1975423 U.S. 3
Summary
The Court, in a per curiam opinion, held that the federal district court must apply the conflict‑of‑law rules of the state in which it sits—in this case Texas—under Klaxon, vacating the Fifth Circuit's judgment and remanding for further proceedings. Justice Blackmun filed a brief concurrence, noting that while he would have denied certiorari, he agrees with the per curiam opinion’s directive that the appellate court apply Texas choice‑of‑law rules, though it may still find Texas strict liability applicable.
Holding
- Whether a federal court sitting in diversity must apply the conflict‑of‑law rules of the state in which it sits (Texas) under Klaxon.. The Court held that the federal district court must apply the conflict‑of‑law rules of Texas, as required by Klaxon, and vacated the appellate judgment for remand.
Docket 75-245
Cited by
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Charles Redwine, as Trustee of the Okc Corporation Liquidating Trust Charles Redwine…
- Servicios Comerciales Andinos, S.a., Plaintiff-Appellee v. General Electric Del Caribe, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
- Zoraida Montalvo
- A. Henry "hank” Soar, Plaintiffs, Appellants v. National Football League Players’ Association…
- Seafirst Commercial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Defendant-Appellee
- Marjorie Marie Valedon Martinez, Plaintiff, Appellee v. Hospital Presbiteriano De La Comunidad, Inc., Defendant…
- Ronald Borden, Plaintiffs, Appellants v. the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Defendant, Appellee…
- Servicios Commercial v. General Electric