Supreme Court of the United States
Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
June 10, 1968392 U.S. 206
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Harlan, held that § 106(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act gives courts of appeals exclusive review jurisdiction only over determinations made during § 242(b) deportation proceedings, including determinations incident to motions to reopen those proceedings. A district director's subsequent denial of a stay, entered outside those proceedings and not challenging the deportation order itself, falls outside that jurisdiction. The Court therefore affirmed the Third Circuit's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Justice White dissented without any noted joinder, reasoning that the statutory word “pursuant” encompasses a stay denial entered as a consequence of an outstanding deportation order; he would have reversed.
Holding
- Scope of the courts of appeals' exclusive review jurisdiction under § 106(a).. Section 106(a) embraces only determinations made during proceedings conducted under § 242(b), including determinations incident to motions to reopen those proceedings. It does not encompass the district director's separate denial of petitioner's requested stay of deportation.
Docket 638
Cited authorities
- 66 Stat. 209
- 8 U.S.C. § 1252
- 75 Stat. 651
- 8 U.S.C. § 1282
- 8 U.S.C. § 1153
- 8 U.S.C. § 1253
- 8 C.F.R. § 242.8
- 8 C.F.R. § 243.4
Cited by
- Zadvydas v. Davis
- Maria Teresa Prado, Petitioner v. Janet Reno
- John M. Panagopoulos, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent; Rocco D’alessio Et…
- Dalton Fernando Gando-Coello, Petitioner, Appellant v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, Appellee
- Charles A. Silverman and Ulku Silverman v. William P. Rogers
- Rosa Elida Castro v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- Lilian Pahola Calderon Jimenez and Luis Gordillo
- Novell, Inc., and Software Spectrum, Inc. v. the United States, and Lotus Development Corp. and Asap Software…