Supreme Court of the United States
Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
December 16, 1963375 U.S. 217
Summary
The Court, through Chief Justice Warren, held that § 106(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act gives the Courts of Appeals initial, exclusive jurisdiction to review denials of suspension of deportation made during deportation proceedings. The statutory phrase “final orders of deportation” encompasses these determinations, consistent with longstanding administrative practice and Congress's purpose to consolidate judicial review and prevent delay. The Court reversed and remanded without deciding the merits of Foti's eligibility for relief or whether jurisdiction extends to refusals to reopen proceedings. It also concluded that an intervening amendment potentially barring Foti's relief did not prevent resolution of the jurisdictional question because the amendment's applicability remained debatable. Justice Harlan concurred in the judgment, without any noted joinder, finding the legislative history decisive despite favoring circumspect construction of jurisdictional statutes.
Holding
- Whether a denial of suspension of deportation made during deportation proceedings falls within the exclusive review jurisdiction conferred by § 106(a).. A denial of suspension of deportation made during the proceedings determining deportability is included within a final order of deportation and is subject to initial, exclusive review in the Courts of Appeals.
- Whether the intervening amendment excluding crewmen from suspension relief made the jurisdictional dispute moot.. The amendment did not preclude deciding the jurisdictional question because its applicability to Foti remained debatable and relief was not indisputably unavailable.
Docket 28
Cited authorities
- 8 U.S.C. § 1251
- Pub. L. 87-301,
- 75 Stat. 651
- Pub. L. 87-885, § 4
- 76 Stat. 1247
- 64 Stat. 1129
- 5 U.S.C. § 1031-1042
- 71 Yale L.J. 760
Cited by
- John M. Panagopoulos, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent; Rocco D’alessio Et…
- Gulabbhai Vallabhbhai Lad and Ambaben Gulabbhai Lad, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent
- Phillip Terrance Moore, Petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent
- White v. INS
- W-F
- Ray C. Foster v. Edward J. Derwinski
- Mario Ruiz Massieu v. Janet Reno
- Garfield O. Gayle v. Jeh Johnson