Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.
June 8, 1959360 U.S. 19
Summary
Justice Black’s opinion affirmed the trial court’s interpretation of a consent decree limiting dividends paid by common-carrier pipelines to their shipper-owners. Allowable dividends were calculated from 7% of the pipeline property’s valuation and allocated according to stock ownership, without the additional reduction for debt financing urged by the Government. The decree’s ordinary meaning, the parties’ consistent interpretation over approximately 16 years, and the trial court’s finding of their intent controlled despite the Government’s argument that another interpretation would better advance the governing statutes. The Court did not decide laches, estoppel, or possible modification of the decree. Justice Douglas dissented, but no dissenting opinion is supplied. Justices Clark and Harlan did not participate.
Holding
- Interpretation of the consent decree’s dividend limitation.. The decree permitted each shipper-owner to receive its stock-ownership share of 7% of the pipeline property’s valuation, without the debt-based reduction proposed by the Government.
Docket 210
Cited authorities
- 49 U.S.C. § 43
- 32 Stat. 847
- 49 U.S.C. §§ 41
- 24 Stat. 380
- 49 U.S.C. § 6
- 32 Stat. 823
- 15 U.S.C. § 29
- 49 U.S.C. § 45
Cited by
- United States of America v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., Sidney S. Harris, Intervenors-Appellants, National…
- Standard Oil Company of California v. United States
- Kit-Dal Cinema, Inc. v. Village of Downers Grove, Illinois
- Willie M., a Minor Jeanette M., a Minor Tom H., a Minor Timothy B., a Minor, All by Their Next Friend, Albert…
- Barbara FOX, Alan M. Lerner, Georgiana Teaford, Alice Lipscomb, Thelma Dingle, Hattie Shelton, Catherine Neff…
- Carl W. Stotts v. Memphis Fire…
- United States v. State of Colorado Roy Romer
- Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Board of Education, Ohio Department of Education, Cross-Appellee, Coalition for Hispanic…