Supreme Court of the United States
Kelly v. Kosuga
February 24, 1959358 U.S. 516
Summary
Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court affirmed enforcement of the unpaid purchase price for onions despite allegations that the sale accompanied an agreement violating the Sherman Act. The illegality defense applies only where the judgment itself would enforce the precise conduct prohibited by the Act. Enforcing a completed sale at a fair price did not enforce the accompanying restriction on futures-market deliveries because the sale constituted an intelligible economic transaction in itself. Federal law governs the effect of illegality under a federal statute, including in diversity cases. Justices Black and Douglas dissented; the supplied text contains no explanation of their views.
Holding
- Availability of a Sherman Act illegality defense to recovery of the purchase price.. The alleged Sherman Act violation did not bar recovery for the completed onion sale at a fair price, notwithstanding the accompanying restrictive agreement.
- Law governing the effect of federal statutory illegality in a diversity contract action.. Federal law governs the effect of illegality under a federal statute, even though state law generally governs the contractual rights and duties of buyers and sellers.
Docket 267
Cited authorities
- 26 Stat. 209
- 15 U.S.C. § 1
- 42 Stat. 1003
Cited by
- Avant, Incorporated v. Tech Ridge, Inc.
- C. R. Bard, Inc. v. Medical Electronics Corp.
- Credit Bureau Reports, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Retail Credit Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Credit…
- Response of Carolina v. Leasco Response, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco…
- Carpa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Ward Foods, Inc., Third-Party Appellants-Appellees v. Bill G…
- United States v. the City of Miami, Florida, Fraternal Order of Police, City of Miami Lodge No. 20, Kenneth R…
- FCE Benefit Administrators Inc v. Independence Holding Company
- Jsaa Realty, LLC v. Hak Man Lee Trust