Supreme Court of the United States

Ingram v. United States

June 29, 1959360 U.S. 672

Summary

The Court held that the evidence supported the conspiracy convictions of the lottery operators who were liable for the federal wagering taxes and had concealed the business and its income, but did not support the convictions of two clerical employees who were not shown to know of that tax liability. The Court required proof that each alleged conspirator knew the facts establishing the federal tax obligation and possessed the criminal intent necessary for willful tax evasion. Justice Harlan, joined by Justices Douglas and Brennan, would have reversed all convictions because the record lacked direct evidence that any petitioner knew a tax was imposed.

Holding

  • Sufficiency of evidence for conspiracy to evade federal wagering taxes. The evidence was sufficient to sustain Ingram's and Jenkins's conspiracy convictions because they operated or had a proprietary interest in the wagering enterprise, were liable for the federal taxes, willfully failed to pay them, and agreed to conceal the business and its income. The evidence was insufficient to sustain Smith's and Law's convictions because it did not show that they knew Ingram and Jenkins were liable for federal wagering taxes.

Docket 457

Cited authorities

Cited by