Supreme Court of the United States
Theard v. United States
June 17, 1957354 U.S. 278
Summary
Justice Frankfurter’s opinion held that state disbarment does not automatically require federal disbarment. Federal courts retain independent responsibility to determine whether reciprocal discipline accords with principles of right and justice. The District Court erred by apparently treating Louisiana’s disbarment as binding despite Theard’s conceded mental irresponsibility when he committed the misconduct eighteen years earlier. The Court remanded for reconsideration under Selling v. Radford and this opinion. Chief Justice Warren and Justice Black concurred in the result without separate opinions; Justice Whittaker did not participate.
Holding
- Effect of state disbarment on an attorney’s eligibility to practice in federal court.. State disbarment is entitled to substantial respect but is not conclusively binding on federal courts. The District Court erred by apparently treating the state disbarment as requiring federal disbarment and must reconsider the motion independently.
Docket 68
Cited authorities
- Rule 1
Cited by
- Ollie Dailey, Noemi Alessandra Collie v. Vought Aircraft Company, Defendant Ollie Dailey, Noemi Alessandra Collie V…
- In Re: Guillermo H. Ramos
- James E. Sanders v. Honorable Dan M. Russell, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District Of…
- In Re F. Lee Bailey, Appellant
- In the Matter of Angus M. MacNeil. Petition of Anthony Julian
- Glenwood Farms, Inc., Plaintiff v. Cozen O'Connor, Defendants
- Whitehouse v. Usdc for Ri
- In Re William C. Sheridan, William C. Sheridan, Defendant, Appellant v. Nancy Michels, Plaintiff, — Lynch, J…