Supreme Court of the United States
McMahon v. United States
November 5, 1951342 U.S. 25
Summary
The Court held that the two-year limitation period for a seaman’s suit against the United States under the Suits in Admiralty Act begins on the date of injury, not when the administrative claim is disallowed, and affirmed the Third Circuit’s judgment. The Court declined to decide whether the limitation period is tolled for up to sixty days while an administrative claim is pending because the record was unclear and petitioner had not raised the issue. Justices Black and Douglas dissented together, adopting Thurston’s reasoning that the period begins upon administrative disallowance and would have reversed. Justice Minton did not participate.
Holding
- When the two-year limitation period begins for a seaman’s claim requiring administrative disallowance before suit against the United States.. The limitation period begins on the date of injury, not upon administrative disallowance of the claim.
Docket 17
Cited authorities
- 57 Stat. 45
- 41 Stat. 526
- 46 U.S.C. § 745
- 8 FR 5414
- 46 C.F.R. § 304.26
Cited by
- Southern Pacific Company v. United States of America and Southwestern Towing & Shell Co., in Personam, and the Mike…
- Gulf Refining Company v. United States
- Charlene Loeber, and Glen Loeber v. Bay…
- Ramirez v. Garcia
- Timothy Doyle; Greg Hagaman; Brian Lague; Anthony W. Richards; Eric Edwards, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants…
- Eric C. Nickerson, Plaintiff-Appellant v. United States of America, Appellee
- United States of America, Plaintiff, Appellant v. Robert E. Meyer, Defendant, Appellee
- Gilbert T. Gonsalves, Plaintiff, Appellant v. Internal Revenue Service, Defendant, Appellee