Supreme Court of the United States
Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.
January 3, 1949335 U.S. 595
Summary
The Court held that the estate could not deduct the charitable remainder from the taxable estate because the trustees had unrestricted discretion to invade or consume the corpus for the mother’s pleasure, comfort, and welfare. The possibility of depletion was not presently ascertainable at the testator’s death, even though the mother was elderly, frugal, independently wealthy, and ultimately left the corpus intact. Justice Frankfurter, dissenting, would have affirmed the judgment below rather than extend the prior decision further.
Holding
- Whether the charitable remainder qualified for the estate-tax charitable deduction. The charitable remainder was not presently ascertainable and severable from the private interest because the trustees’ broad discretion permitted invasion or consumption of the corpus for the mother’s pleasure, comfort, welfare, and desires. The charitable deduction was therefore unavailable.
Docket 90
Cited authorities
- 26 U.S.C. §812
- 53 Stat. 124
- 56 Stat. 949
- 58 Stat. 74