U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 2004

Published opinions from 2004. The case name opens the case page.

2004 opinions

The court reversed the district court’s affirmance of the denial of benefits because the ALJ did not properly evaluate the treating physicians’ opinions and the step-two finding was not supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ also failed to show that he considered the combined effect of Langley’s impairments.