The court concluded that the ALJ’s finding that Taylor was not disabled before his insured status expired was not supported by substantial evidence because the ALJ did not properly determine the onset date or adequately develop and evaluate the record.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2005
Published opinions from 2005. The case name opens the case page.
2005 opinions
7th Cir.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Mykytiuk, Defendant-Appellant
July 7, 2005415 F.3d 606
The court held that a properly calculated Guidelines sentence is presumptively reasonable, though the presumption may be rebutted by showing that the sentence is unreasonable under the statutory sentencing factors.
7th Cir.Donald F. Greeno, Plaintiff-Appellant v. George Daley, Defendants-Appellees
July 1, 2005414 F.3d 645
The court held that Greeno exhausted his prison remedies and that a jury could find deliberate indifference by three medical defendants, but not by the complaint-review officials or Dr. Avestruz.
7th Cir.David Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Timothy Budz, Defendants-Appellees
February 16, 2005398 F.3d 904
The court held that Brown’s allegations adequately stated due-process failure-to-protect and equal-protection claims, so dismissal of those claims was improper in substantial part.
7th Cir.Herbert L. Board, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Karl Farnham, Jr., Defendants-Appellants
January 5, 2005394 F.3d 469
The court affirmed the denial of qualified immunity on the Boards’ claims concerning prolonged denial of toothpaste, denial of Duke’s asthma inhaler, and unhealthy jail ventilation.