U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Published opinions from 2007. The case name opens the case page.

2007 opinions

The Ninth Circuit held that the ALJ lacked clear and convincing reasons to reject Lingenfelter’s testimony about disabling pain and limitations. Because the vocational expert testified that those credited limitations would eliminate available work, the court reversed and remanded for calculation and award of benefits.

9th Cir.Leo Orn, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Michael J. Astrue

July 16, 2007495 F.3d 625

The Ninth Circuit held that the ALJ improperly rejected the opinions of Orn’s treating physicians and Orn’s testimony because the reasons given were legally insufficient. Crediting that evidence establishes disability, so the court reversed the district court and remanded for calculation of benefits.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part a district court judgment upholding the denial of Supplemental Security Income benefits. Deciding the question for the first time, the panel held that, consistent with SSR 00-4p and joining the Third, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, an ALJ may not rely…