Published opinions from 1994. The case name opens the case page.
October 26, 199437 F.3d 1069
The en banc court affirmed summary judgment for all defendants because the plaintiffs produced no evidence from which a jury could find that nasal fatigue caused the workers’ failure to detect the gas or contributed to their deaths, and their alternative explanations were speculative.
April 20, 199419 F.3d 1527
The court affirmed summary judgment for the City and officers because the appellants did not identify evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the officers intentionally intercepted or procured the interception of the conversations.
The Fifth Circuit held that Cinel’s due-process claims concerning transactional immunity and a fair trial were unripe because the related state proceedings remained pending and any injury was speculative, so those claims had to be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.