Michigan lawSpousal SupportChild SupportAlimonyMarriageDivorce

Michigan Spousal support: Eligibility, Amount, and Duration

September 10, 2026 · LawDiver Research Team

Michigan's rule on spousal support turns on a feature the national template does not capture: Michigan calls it spousal support. Discretionary multi-factor analysis under case law (length of marriage, ability to work, fault, age, health, needs, and prior standard of living). No statewide formula. Forms include Temporary and permanent (modifiable) periodic support; lump-sum awards appear in some settlements.. The controlling authority is Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23. Duration: Duration is equitable; longer marriages more often yield longer or open-ended awards. Termination: Death, remarriage, or a court-ordered end date; cohabitation may support modification.

Key takeaways

  • Michigan uses the term spousal support under Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23.
  • Amount and duration are largely discretionary, guided by statutory factors. Discretionary multi-factor analysis under case law (length of marriage, ability to work, fault, age, health, needs, and prior standard of living). No statewide formula.
  • Common forms include: Temporary and permanent (modifiable) periodic support; lump-sum awards appear in some settlements.
  • Duration framework: Duration is equitable; longer marriages more often yield longer or open-ended awards.
  • Permanent / indefinite support: Yes, particularly after long marriages, subject to modification upon change of circumstances.
  • Companion child-support guide: Michigan child support guidelines.

Worked example under Michigan law

The illustration below uses only rules already stated for Michigan. It is a research hypothetical, not a prediction of what a court will do.

One spouse asks a Michigan court for spousal support after a divorce filing.

  1. Use the label and statute Michigan actually uses: spousal support under Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23.
  2. There is no formula. Apply the statutory factors: Discretionary multi-factor analysis under case law (length of marriage, ability to work, fault, age, health, needs, and prior standard of living). No statewide formula.
  3. Set duration from Michigan rules: Duration is equitable; longer marriages more often yield longer or open-ended awards.
  4. Identify what ends the award: Death, remarriage, or a court-ordered end date; cohabitation may support modification.

Yes, particularly after long marriages, subject to modification upon change of circumstances. Fault: Fault remains a recognized factor in Michigan spousal support decisions. Post-2018 federal TCJA rules apply; Michigan generally conforms for state tax purposes.

What spousal support is (and is not)

Spousal support is court-ordered support from one spouse to the other after separation or divorce. It is separate from child support (see Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.605; Michigan Child Support Formula Manual) and from property division. A single judgment may include all three, but each has its own legal tests.

No spouse is automatically entitled to spousal support. Courts typically ask whether one party has a genuine need and whether the other has the ability to pay, then apply Michigan's statutory framework.

Eligibility and statutory factors

Discretionary multi-factor analysis under case law (length of marriage, ability to work, fault, age, health, needs, and prior standard of living). No statewide formula.

Fault. Fault remains a recognized factor in Michigan spousal support decisions.

Document income, earning capacity, health, length of marriage, contributions as homemaker or to the other spouse's career, and the marital standard of living. Those facts drive both temporary (pendente lite) and final awards.

Types of spousal support in Michigan

Temporary and permanent (modifiable) periodic support; lump-sum awards appear in some settlements.

Labeling matters. Rehabilitative awards usually require a plan (schooling, retraining, re-entry to the workforce). Durational or term awards run for a fixed period. Lump-sum or reimbursement awards may be non-modifiable depending on the judgment language and statute.

How amount is set

Michigan does not use a statewide calculator for final spousal support. Judges weigh the statutory factors and the record. Online “alimony calculators” are at best rough illustrations and are not controlling.

Temporary support while a divorce is pending often follows different local practices or guidelines than the final award. Confirm what your county or division actually uses.

How long spousal support lasts

Duration is equitable; longer marriages more often yield longer or open-ended awards.

Permanent / indefinite support. Yes, particularly after long marriages, subject to modification upon change of circumstances.

When spousal support ends or can be changed

Death, remarriage, or a court-ordered end date; cohabitation may support modification.

Either party may usually seek modification upon a substantial change in circumstances unless the award was expressly made non-modifiable. Retirement, disability, remarriage, cohabitation, and large income swings are frequent triggers — but the statutory test and burden of proof are Michigan-specific.

Taxes

Post-2018 federal TCJA rules apply; Michigan generally conforms for state tax purposes.

Child support remains non-deductible and non-taxable. Do not assume spousal support treatment mirrors child support.

Case law: how Michigan courts decide spousal support

These LawDiver opinions illustrate how Michigan appellate courts discuss need, ability to pay, duration, and related issues:

Gates v. Gates

Gates v. Gates, 256 Mich. App. 420 (2003)

…de it clear that “MCL 552.28 . . . will always apply to any alimony arrangement adjudicated by the trial court when the parties are unable to reach their own agreement.” Thus, under both Staple, supra, and MCL 552.28, because the spousal-support provision of the divorce judgment resulted from the trial court’s disposition rather than agreement of the parties, the judgment may n…

On spousal support, Gates v. Gates speaks to the Michigan dispute in this passage: "MCL 552.28 . . . will always apply to any alimony arrangement adjudicated by the trial court when the parties are unable to reach their own agreement.” Thus, under both Staple, supra, and MCL 552." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

Sherri L Richards v. William H Richards III

Sherri L Richards v. William H Richards III, 310 Mich. App. 683 (2015)

…the parties’ ages, (6) the abilities of the parties to pay alimony, (7) the present situation of the parties, (8) the needs of the parties, (9) the parties’ health, (10) the prior standard of living of the parties and whether either is responsible for the support of others, (11) contributions of the parties to the joint estate, (12) a party’s fault in causing the divorce, (13)…

On spousal support, Sherri L Richards v. William H Richards III speaks to the Michigan dispute in this passage: "the parties’ ages, (6) the abilities of the parties to pay alimony, (7) the present situation of the parties, (8) the needs of the parties, (9) the parties’ health, (10) the prior standard of living of the parties and whether either is responsible for the support of others, (11)" The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

ROSE v. ROSE

ROSE v. ROSE, 289 Mich. App. 45 (2010)

…ement “and instead stipulate that their agreement regarding alimony is final, binding, and nonmodifiable[.]” The Court in Staple answered this question affirmatively, holding that if divorcing parties negotiate a settlement in which they clearly and unambiguously forgo their statutory right to petition for modification of spousal support, courts must enforce their agreement. Id…

Michigan opinions such as ROSE v. ROSE are cited where spousal support is disputed. The court stated: "The Court in Staple answered this question affirmatively, holding that if divorcing parties negotiate a settlement in which they clearly and unambiguously forgo their statutory right to petition for modification of spousal support, courts must enforce their agreement." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

Korth v. Korth

Korth v. Korth, 256 Mich. App. 286 (2003)

…support. Dispositional rulings include whether and how much alimony to award. Ianitelli v Ianitelli, 199 Mich App 641, 642; 502 NW2d 691 (1993). Defendant also argues, “In light of the fact that the Court ordered [defendant] to pay spousal support, [plaintiffs] workers’ compensation lawsuit should have been divided like the other property.” In light of our conclusion that the t…

Korth v. Korth is worth reading on Michigan spousal support because the court put the point in its own words: "Dispositional rulings include whether and how much alimony to award. Ianitelli v Ianitelli, 199 Mich App 641, 642; 502 NW2d 691 (1993)." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Fred M. Seibly, Administrator, etc. v. Rollin H. Person, Circuit Judge of Ingham County

Fred M. Seibly, Administrator, etc. v. Rollin H. Person, Circuit Judge of Ingham County, 105 Mich. 584 (1895)

…s further ordered that the consideration of the question of alimony be, and the same is hereby, reserved for further order and decree herein.” *586No further steps were taken by either party to the case until the death of Edward J. Adams, which occurred on the 15th day of September, 1894. Edward J. Adams died testate, and Fred M. Seibly was appointed administrator of his estate…

Fred M. Seibly, Administrator, etc. v. Rollin H. Person, Circuit Judge of Ingham County is worth reading on Michigan spousal support because the court put the point in its own words: "No further steps were taken by either party to the case until the death of Edward J. Adams, which occurred on the 15th day of September, 1894. Edward J. Adams died testate, and Fred M." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Practical checklist

  • Identify the correct statutory label (spousal support) and controlling section (Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23).
  • Assemble income, budget, and health evidence for both spouses.
  • For rehabilitative requests, prepare a concrete plan and timeline.
  • Address fault only if Michigan law makes it relevant to eligibility or amount.
  • Search LawDiver for recent Michigan decisions before mediation.
  • Cross-check child support interactions via the Michigan child support guide.

Frequently asked questions

Does Michigan still award permanent spousal support?

Yes, particularly after long marriages, subject to modification upon change of circumstances.

How is spousal support calculated in Michigan?

Michigan leaves amount largely to judicial discretion under Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23, guided by statutory factors rather than a mandatory statewide calculator.

How long do I have to be married to receive spousal support?

Duration is equitable; longer marriages more often yield longer or open-ended awards. Short marriages rarely produce long-term awards; longer marriages support broader remedies where the statute allows.

Does remarriage or cohabitation end spousal support?

Death, remarriage, or a court-ordered end date; cohabitation may support modification.

Is spousal support taxable?

Post-2018 federal TCJA rules apply; Michigan generally conforms for state tax purposes.

Where can I read Michigan spousal support opinions?

Open the cases linked above or search LawDiver scoped to Michigan. For support of children, see the Michigan child support guidelines guide.

Disclaimer

This article provides general information about Michigan spousal support and is not legal advice. Confirm the current text of Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.23 and consult a licensed Michigan family-law attorney before acting on any rule described here.

Michigan spousal support Guide (2026) | LawDiver