A. J. Johnson, Appellant (plaintiff Below) v. Nick Soulis and Catherine Soulis, Appellees (defendants Below)

Summary

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Soulis in Johnson's action seeking rescission and damages based on fraud and undue influence. The court held that Johnson could not reasonably rely on the alleged promise of $700 monthly payments because he knew before executing the contract that Soulis would not make that payment, and the remaining circumstances did not establish actionable fraud or undue influence. No separate opinions were filed.