Lock, Plaintiff in Error v. State, Defendant in Error; Lowry, Plaintiff in Error, v. State, Defendant in Error

Summary

The court affirmed the defendants' convictions, holding that the evidence, viewed most favorably to the prosecution, was sufficient for a reasonable fact finder to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It also upheld denial of a new trial because the proposed evidence was hearsay as presented, cumulative, impeaching, and unlikely to produce a different verdict, and rejected the warrant challenge as untimely. The court further declined to grant a new trial in the interests of justice because the record did not show a probable miscarriage of justice or likely acquittal.