The Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar, Complainant v. Thomas H. McCorkle, a Member of The…

Summary

The Court found that the Committee proved by clear and convincing evidence that McCorkle used cocaine, improperly solicited clients through a hospital worker, and gave false testimony during the disciplinary proceeding. It clarified that legal conclusions, application of law to facts, and sanctions are reviewed de novo, while factual findings receive substantial deference unless unsupported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. The Court imposed the recommended two-year suspension, treatment and counseling requirements, reinstatement conditions, and costs.