Daniel M. Winn v. Aleda Construction Co., Inc

Summary

The Court held that Aleda Construction could not recover the unpaid balance of the final construction draw because the contract required strict performance, full completion, a final survey, and an executed release of liens, none of which Aleda had fully provided. The Court also held that the Winns' construction-deficiency claims did not establish actual fraud. It therefore reversed the judgment and entered final judgment for the Winns.