Earl Ward, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Intermountain Farmers Association, a Utah Corporation, Defendant and Appellee

Summary

The Utah Supreme Court reversed the district court’s summary judgment, holding that Ward’s claim is a timely breach‑of‑contract action and that the release agreement is ambiguous, so extrinsic evidence may be admitted to determine its scope. The decision was joined by two concurring justices and was contested by a dissent.