Turtle Management, Inc., a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Haggis Management, Inc., a Utah…

Summary

The Utah Supreme Court affirmed the district court's judgment, holding that Turtle Management was limited to nominal damages, that the covenant not to compete was enforceable, that attorney’s fees were properly limited to fees associated with the injunction against John Landon, and that the plaintiff’s payments to the clerk under Rule 67 did not constitute a default. The court also declined to award broader attorney’s fees or compensatory damages due to insufficient proof of causation and loss.