Supreme Court of South Carolina

The State, Respondent v. Luzenski Allen Cottrell, Appellant — Few, J., Concurring

December 20, 2017421 S.C. 622

Summary

Justice Few concurs with the majority’s affirmation of the trial court’s decision but argues that a trial court lacks discretion to remove a criminal defendant’s counsel over the defendant’s objection without specific findings of legal disqualification, and that the trial court erred by refusing to disclose the contents of a jury note, though the error is harmless.