Deborah M. Dawkins v. David M. Siwicki, M.d.

Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's judgment, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff's pre‑trial and trial motions, including the subpoena, the admission of habit evidence, and the denial of a Rule 50 judgment as a matter of law, and that the jury’s verdict was supported by sufficient evidence.