Penncrest SD v. Cagle, T., Aplt.

Summary

The Supreme Court considered whether Facebook posts by Penncrest School Board members constitute “records” under the Right‑to‑Know Law, focusing on the statutory phrase “of an agency” and the appropriate analytical factors. Justice Dougherty wrote a concurring‑in‑part and dissenting‑in‑part opinion, agreeing with the majority’s disposition to remand for further fact‑finding but criticizing the Commonwealth Court’s factor test. The Court affirmed the lower court’s order remanding the case.