In the Int. of: E.J.A., a Minor; Apl. of: E.A.

Summary

Justice Donohue dissents, arguing that the majority erred by dismissing the appeal and that the trial court failed to meet the clear‑and‑convincing‑evidence standard required for termination of parental rights. He contends the trial court relied on a single CYF caseworker’s testimony while ignoring competent, corroborating testimony from multiple witnesses. Donohue would remand for a proper evidentiary review rather than uphold the terminations.