Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In the Int. of: B.W., a Minor; Apl. of: T.W.A.

March 26, 2025

Summary

Justice Donohue, in a dissent, argues that the trial court failed to meet the clear‑and‑convincing‑evidence burden required for termination of parental rights, relying on a single caseworker’s testimony while ignoring competent, corroborating evidence, and therefore the appeal should not be dismissed as improvidently granted.