In the Int. of: B.W., a Minor; Apl. of: E.A.

Summary

Justice Donohue dissents, arguing that the trial court’s termination of parental rights was not supported by clear and convincing evidence because it relied on a single caseworker’s testimony while ignoring competent testimony from multiple witnesses. The dissent contends that the majority’s dismissal of the appeal as improvidently granted is erroneous and urges remand for a proper evidentiary review.