In the Int. of: A.B.A., a Minor; Apl. of: T.W.A.

Summary

Justice Donohue dissented, arguing that the trial court’s termination of parental rights was not supported by clear and convincing evidence because it relied on a single caseworker’s testimony despite contradictory competent evidence, and that the majority erred in dismissing the appeal as improvidently granted. The dissent emphasizes the constitutional protection of parental rights and the high burden of proof required for termination, urging remand for proper factual consideration.