In re Ashton

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court held that respondent violated RPC 3.4(c) and RPC 8.4(a)(4) but not RPC 3.4(b), and imposed a 30‑day suspension rather than the trial panel’s 60‑day suspension. The court applied de novo review, requiring clear and convincing evidence of each violation. It found the violations knowing and prejudicial to the administration of justice. The sanction was reduced based on mitigating factors.