Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Logston

July 31, 2025374 Or. 101

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals and the trial court, holding that under Article I, section 44(1)(b) of the Oregon Constitution the Lake County trial court had authority to impose a consecutive incarceration term as a probation‑revocation sanction when the defendant’s offenses involved multiple victims. The Court relied on its prior decision in State v. Lane and declined to resolve the statutory question presented.