State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court held that ORS 646.608(1)(b) and ORS 646.608(1)(e) do not require a showing that the alleged deception be material to consumer purchasing decisions and that neither provision is facially unconstitutional under the Oregon Constitution or the U.S. Constitution. Accordingly, it reversed the Court of Appeals and remanded for further proceedings.