In the Matter of the Reinstatement of Carey

Summary

The Court denied Carey’s petition for reinstatement because she did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that she remained competent to practice law, had avoided unauthorized practice throughout the suspension period, and possessed the moral character required for admission. The Court emphasized her limited law-related study, failures to comply with reinstatement requirements, incomplete affidavits, and unfiled income-tax returns. Carey was ordered to pay proceeding costs and wait at least one year before reapplying.