Leo v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

Summary

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed the district court's order reviewing the Oklahoma Water Resources Board's permit to the City of Oklahoma City, holding that only the agency must be named as a respondent for jurisdiction, that the permit does not constitute a taking, that the district court properly denied limited discovery, and that the Four Points of Law were correctly applied. The Court also distinguished Purcell v. Parker and Franco‑American Charolaise as inapplicable.